| landley | Anybody know why the devuan mirrors don't work from tokyo? | 06:18 |
|---|---|---|
| onefang | The deb.devuan.org package mirrors you mean? | 06:21 |
| landley | Yup. | 06:21 |
| landley | apt-get update and friends only work if I VPN back to the states. | 06:21 |
| onefang | Is it resolving differently? | 06:22 |
| landley | It seems to be geographically distributing to something that doesn't have the right keys? | 06:23 |
| amarsh04 | I also use http://sledjhamr.org/devuan/merged as a fast mirror | 06:23 |
| onefang | sledjhamr is mine. That's working from Tokyo? | 06:24 |
| onefang | The deb.devuan.org DNS-RR shouldn't be geographic, you use a CC.deb.devuan.org if you want that, where CC is the country code. The only thing "geographic" might be your DNS resolver. | 06:27 |
| landley | Ok, not a known issue then. I'll see if it behaves differently from a couple coffee shops... | 06:29 |
| landley | Thanks. | 06:29 |
| onefang | You are welcome, and good luck. | 06:29 |
| amarsh04 | I visit Japan often but haven't had a Devuan machine with me when I do. | 06:30 |
| onefang | We don't have any mirror monitoring infrastructure there. | 06:32 |
| onefang | devuan.m10k.jp is actually in Japan, so might be useful as a local mirror there. | 06:34 |
| amarsh04 | anyone here currently running timidity / timidity-daemon under Devuan? | 13:00 |
| gnarface | amarsh04: i'm not, though i am still using it for dosbox anyway. what's your question? | 14:37 |
| amarsh04 | gnarface, I posted in the forum, but the timidity start-up script fails due to the timidity binary not supporting a --pidfile option like the start-up script uses | 14:41 |
| gnarface | really? that's weird... | 14:43 |
| gnarface | working for me | 14:44 |
| gnarface | are you on daedalus? | 14:44 |
| amarsh04 | no, ceres | 14:45 |
| amarsh04 | I can try an older version | 14:45 |
| gnarface | oh, they must have broke it then in ceres | 14:45 |
| gnarface | it's working fine on daedalus for me anyway, though i don't usually run it by the init script because it's useless for dosbox if it doesn't start as the same user as dosbox | 14:46 |
| gnarface | (that information was way harder to find than it should have been) | 14:47 |
| amarsh04 | OK timidity / timidity-daemon 2.14.0-8 appear to work | 14:51 |
| amarsh04 | gnarface, not working after all, will check further | 15:07 |
| gnarface | could it actually be a problem with daemon tools? | 15:08 |
| amarsh04 | could be, might also boot into an older kernel to try that | 15:08 |
| gnarface | er, i guess start-stop-daemon is in dpkg now | 15:09 |
| gnarface | but yea i think they could have broke that | 15:09 |
| amarsh04 | a pidfile does get created but the timidity process dies very quickly | 15:09 |
| gnarface | hmm | 15:09 |
| amarsh04 | I could customise the init script to use the daeamon binary from the daemon package instead | 15:10 |
| amarsh04 | daemon binary even | 15:10 |
| SamuelMarks | hi | 20:13 |
| SamuelMarks | I am playing around with init systems to try and get a consistent experience whether inside or outside of Docker. So outside of Docker default OS+distribution init system (e.g., systemd, openrc); but inside Docker I am figuring things out. Lots of s6-overlay proponents… but what do you think of just openrc on debian derived distributions? | 20:16 |
| * SamuelMarks posted https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=7136 | 20:23 | |
| davesp | So you're advocating against Init Freedom? ("https://www.devuan.org/os/init-freedom") | 22:03 |
| golinux | Whaaat? | 22:09 |
| fsmithred | depends on how you interpret the question. "just openrc" for Sam or for everyone? | 22:11 |
| SamuelMarks | davesp - Kinda the opposite. I'm trying to figure out the best way to have init freedom but for practical interoperability rather than commitment-to-freedom reasons | 23:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!