| Wizzup | 23:19 < sicelo> Wizzup: btw addition in github repo also automatically grants on Jenkins side? | 01:06 |
|---|---|---|
| Wizzup | it does not, good point | 01:06 |
| sicelo | someone ran geekbench on N900 - https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22895810 | 08:09 |
| sicelo | this was with overclocking to 805MHz ... poor N900 :-) | 08:12 |
| freemangordon | sicelo: if there is no SIM in the modem, shall I show that modem in control panel "phone" settings? | 12:22 |
| sicelo | yes, I think so. some modem settings are valid even without Sim. also, you *might* be able to do emergency calls on said modem, without a sim | 15:41 |
| freemangordon | ok | 16:37 |
| freemangordon | thought so, just wanted a confirm | 16:37 |
| sicelo | touchscreen 'hang' issue on Droid 4 on incoming call is occuring for me nearly 100% of the time. i've already missed a number of calls due to the problem | 21:14 |
| sicelo | arno11: does that happen on N900, even if rarely? | 21:27 |
| sicelo | i.e. call comes in, sphone shows up, but you can't touch the | 21:27 |
| sicelo | the Answer button until you lock-unlock the device first? | 21:28 |
| arno11 | arno11: never happened on my device | 21:36 |
| arno11 | weird behaviour | 21:36 |
| arno11 | is your device responsive and quite fast in general or ? | 21:38 |
| sicelo | Droid 4? very fast, of course :-) | 21:41 |
| sicelo | maybe the TS doesn't wake up fast enough or something | 21:42 |
| sicelo | the problem doesn't seem to happen when the call comes in within a few minutes of having used the device | 21:42 |
| arno11 | lol ofc for d4. but i'm a bit confused: the issue happens on your d4 or n900 ? | 21:45 |
| freemangordon | sicelo: I suspect we have some issue wit TS driver on d4 | 21:49 |
| freemangordon | here it happens TS to be unresponsive without call | 21:50 |
| sicelo | arno11: Droid 4. I was asking about N900 because I've not used it with calls so much. Reason: the | 21:51 |
| sicelo | my n900 with working modem has broken uSb port :p | 21:51 |
| sicelo | and the n900 with working usb port has broken modem, | 21:52 |
| arno11 | ah yes, ok | 21:52 |
| Wizzup | sicelo: try to lock/unlock | 22:01 |
| Wizzup | I think that might help | 22:01 |
| Wizzup | I am not sure if this is kernel or mce | 22:01 |
| sicelo | yes i do lock-unlock. it's just ... when the call comes in, it takes me a while to remember this dance, and some callers aren't so patient | 22:03 |
| freemangordon | ugh, ofono lies about 'LockedPins' property when pin is enabled | 22:17 |
| freemangordon | this is for QUECTEL modems | 22:18 |
| sicelo | says none, while pin is enabled? | 22:29 |
| freemangordon | says "LockedPins =" after pin is entered | 22:30 |
| freemangordon | before that it is "LockedPins = pin" | 22:30 |
| freemangordon | also, UnlockPin fails with 'not implemented' | 22:31 |
| freemangordon | the same happens on d4 | 22:31 |
| freemangordon | I even tried current ofono master | 22:31 |
| freemangordon | no joy | 22:31 |
| freemangordon | seem I will ahve to fix that first, before finishing connui-cell :( | 22:31 |
| sicelo | LockedPins should be none if pin is required and has been entered correctly | 22:32 |
| freemangordon | no, it is "PinRequired = none" | 22:32 |
| freemangordon | see https://github.com/maemo-leste-upstream-forks/ofono/blob/maemo-ofono/doc/sim-api.txt | 22:32 |
| freemangordon | Contains the pins that are currently locked and will require the user to enter the password at startup. | 22:33 |
| freemangordon | unless I am missing something | 22:33 |
| sicelo | ah right, yes | 22:34 |
| sicelo | LockedPins is only affected by LockPin and UnlockPin | 22:35 |
| freemangordon | mhm | 22:35 |
| freemangordon | *should* be affected only by | 22:35 |
| sicelo | i.e. enable & disable pin | 22:35 |
| freemangordon | right | 22:35 |
| freemangordon | but EnterPin clears LockedPins | 22:35 |
| freemangordon | clearly a bug | 22:35 |
| freemangordon | sicelo: could you check if it is the same on n900? | 22:37 |
| freemangordon | no rush, but when you have imte | 22:37 |
| freemangordon | *time | 22:37 |
| sicelo | i'm on it right now. iirc it's correct | 22:37 |
| freemangordon | yeah, there is no support for pin state in ofono qmi | 22:45 |
| freemangordon | brb | 22:45 |
| sicelo | weird ... are you sure? | 22:46 |
| sicelo | i can confirm on the L5. i seem to remember it worked, but might be wrong. it *definitely* works with modemmanager | 22:47 |
| sicelo | freemangordon: N900 results https://paste.debian.net/1335747/ | 22:48 |
| sicelo | and indeed, qmi modem in L5 also can't UnlockPin - ` busctl call org.ofono /gobi_1 org.ofono.SimManager UnlockPin ss pin 0000` leads to "Call failed: Implementation not provided" | 23:15 |
| sicelo | and even on L5, EnterPin clears both PinRequired and LockedPins, which is incorrect | 23:17 |
| sicelo | anyway shouldn't be too difficult to fix I guess ... just a matter of aligning them properly | 23:18 |
| Wizzup | freemangordon: is there more modern ofono/qmi work that adds this support? | 23:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!