| UsL | I don't really understand the difference here, this is from apt: network-manager/stable 1.42.4-1+deb12u1devuan1 amd64 [upgradable from: 1.42.4-1devuan1] | 03:03 |
|---|---|---|
| gnarface | hmm... | 03:05 |
| UsL | what was it.. apt-diff, can't remember, that lists differences? Would it tell me what's new? | 03:05 |
| gnarface | yea, looks like they should be the same thing so maybe just a correction of the version string format but better get clarification from someone who knows for sure | 03:05 |
| gnarface | maybe you're thinking of apt-listchanges? not sure | 03:06 |
| UsL | that's probably the one, thanks | 03:07 |
| gnarface | np | 03:09 |
| UsL | "is Dpkg::Tools::Options::/usr/bin/apt-listchanges::InfoFD set to 20?" that's a good question. I guess I need to rtfm | 03:12 |
| UsL | tomorrows problem. Gnight. | 03:14 |
| plasma41 | UsL: If I'm not mistaken, the difference between the Devuan versions 1.42.4-1devuan1 and 1.42.4-1+deb12u1devuan1 will consist of the differences between the Debian versions 1.42.4-1 and 1.42.4-1+deb12u1 upon which they are based. According to https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/n/network-manager/changelog-1.42.4-1deb12u1 that would be a fix for CVE-2024-6501. | 17:47 |
| UsL | alright. So, deb12u1 is like an update (u1) but not significant enough to render a minor number (.4-1) change. | 17:59 |
| UsL | 4-2 would have been logical in my mind, but I guess there are reasons for it to remain | 17:59 |
| plasma41 | UsL: Because 1.42.4-1 was already in stable (Debian 12 Bookworm) when this issue was found and fixed, the fixed package got the "+deb12u1" suffix. If the issue had been found when 1.42.4-1 was still in testing/unstable, it would have been given a 1.42.4-2 version number. | 18:17 |
| UsL | I see. | 18:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!