libera/#devuan/ Saturday, 2024-11-02

Fnerdhi16:02
Xenguyfnord16:04
Fnerdi have my system upgraded from Chimaera to Daedalus and apt says it holds 464 packages back in there are apt and aptutis what can i do?16:05
XenguyFnerd, That doesn't sound like a typical upgrade scenario, which would make your situation some kind of edge case, but why?16:13
Fnerdhmm i dont know16:20
Fnerdwaht info do you need?16:21
Fnerdthere are some logs from the upgrade process or something?16:29
golinuxI seem to remember something about that situation on the D1G forum. Maybe poke around there16:33
Fnerdgolinux: okay was it solved there? :-)16:34
Fnerdmy last upgrade went painless and smooth16:35
golinuxFnerd: Yes. That scenario sounds familiar to me16:37
Fnerdhmm but what should i search the forums for??16:41
Fnerdsorry for my noob/Stupid questions but i have  no clue what i should do :-)16:42
Xenguy'chimaera upgrade problem'16:43
Xenguy?16:43
golinuxYes.16:43
fsmithreddo you have pinned packages?17:00
fsmithredlook in /etc/apt/preferences.d/17:01
Fnerdfsmithred: nothing in there17:11
fsmithredany additional sources in sources.list.d?17:12
fsmithredor run 'apt policy' to see what you have.17:13
fsmithredsomething maybe is not 50017:13
gnarfaceFnerd: did you use anything from chimaera-backports, or from any 3rd party repos?17:14
gnarfacesometimes for various reasons (usually a simple string comparison snafu on the version check) those packages will hold back newer ones17:15
Fnerdfsmithred: no nothing in sources.list.d17:16
Fnerdis empty17:16
fsmithreddid you install from a live-iso or from one of the installer isos?17:16
Fnerdi upgraded17:17
Fnerdand on the grub file i hit esc two times17:17
fsmithreddo you have any non-free firmware installed, and does /etc/apt/sources.list have "non-free-firmware' in it?17:18
fsmithredthat's a change from chimaera to daedalus. Wireless firmware got moved to a new section.17:19
Fnerdhmmm maybe i show you on a pastebin what i have done since reboot or there should a logfile somwhere from the upgrade process?17:29
Fnerdmaybe thats better??17:30
Fnerdohz and its only a virtualbox vm devuan on a win 10 host17:30
Fnerdi hope i will be not get no help because i use win and not linux ;-)17:31
fsmithredmany here are forced to use win at work. No worries.17:37
fsmithreduse paste.debian.net17:38
Fnerdokay17:38
Fnerdhmm is it good to paste the complete apt log?17:53
Fnerdi have found ist :-)17:53
Fnerdi have found it :-)17:53
fsmithredmaybe just the most recent upgrade17:53
fsmithreddo you see anthing in it other than a bunch of packages that got installed?17:54
Fnerdthe gpg file was changed18:00
Fnerdso i take the maintianers gpg file18:00
Fnerdis that right18:01
fsmithredFnerd, I usually look at the differences to see if I changed anything18:06
fsmithredwhich gpg file?18:06
gnarfaceFnerd: you did "apt-get dist-upgrade" not just "apt-get upgrade" right?18:07
Fnerdyep18:07
gnarfaceFnerd: you didn't answer me about the chimaera-backports and 3rd party repo packages. if you have any of those you may have to force-upgrade or remove them first for the upgrade to complete18:21
gnarfacethink hard, it might have been a while ago18:21
gnarfacesomething innocuous seeming can cause this type of block just because of a simple version string comparison issue (the version strings are just basically compared in lexical order using some weird field delimiter rules, so for example something like "3.12-bpo12" might look newer to the comparison than "4.0" or something might have a version string that's a datestamp like "20241102" which would do the same thing18:24
gnarface)18:24
gnarfacemaybe wine, or firefox, or some wifi driver firmware?18:25
gnarfacethink about it for a while, and maybe search the output of "dpkg -l" for weird looking version strings18:25
gnarfacebackport packages will always have "bpo" in the version string so you can grep for those18:26
gnarfaceaptitude usually can be helpful diagnosing issues like this18:27
Fnerdthere are firfox-esr vmware stuff kept back18:44
gnarfacethat's probably a clue18:48
gnarfacedoes it tell you which dependencies are blocking the upgrade?18:49
gnarfacelike, if you just try to install firefox-esr from daedalus what error does it give you?18:52
gnarfaceand i think the vmware components are in non-free... you got non-free in your sources.list, right?18:54
Fnerdbut ffmpg and xfce also19:14
Fnerdand apt19:14
Fnerdis this not strange?19:14
gnarfaceFnerd: no, it's not really strange at all, it's in fact a very common problem people have, and i've tried to outline the common causes for you, but to give you a specific path to a fix i'm gonna need some of the information i asked for19:17
CueXXIIIhm, can you upgrade apt secifically? apt-get install apt19:18
Fnerd  let me see19:19
gnarfacethe list of possible causes is very short, and mostly only involves using backports or mixing distros or repos, but one other thing that comes to mind is i think we saw this happen once when someone was trying to upgrade a system where the previous upgrade hadn't been completed yet. as in, they were for example trying to upgrade a chimaera system to daedalus that still was half beowulf19:20
FnerdCueXXIII: he tells me now hw will install apt :-)19:22
CueXXIIIonly apt?19:22
fsmithredaptitude -s safe-upgrade and/or aptitude -s dist-upgrade might give some alternative solutions.19:25
fsmithredthe -s is --simulate19:25
FnerdCueXXIII: no apt-utils gcc12-base libapt.pkg.06 libstdc++619:28
CueXXIIIFnerd: no packages removed? then go ahead, it could solve some dependency problems19:28
FnerdCueXXIII: no19:29
Fnerdwhat why do i got apt-listchanges for unstable??19:31
Fnerdshould i do :q and go on?19:32
CueXXIIIdo you have apt-listchanges installed? it reads the changelogs from the .debs to be upgraded, so it works on any distribution19:32
Fnerdyep it was on screen after i typed Y19:33
Fnerdhmm now apt says it will 48 packeges update19:41
Fnerdi will allow that and see if it blows up19:42
Fnerdright?19:42
gnarfaceyes, and keep at it19:42
gnarfaceafter those upgrade, pick another held package and call for it to be upgraded specifically19:43
Fnerdor should i install all that packeges like apt?19:43
Fnerdokay19:43
Fnerdbut first the 48 packges right?19:43
gnarfaceyes. usually it's just one or two packages holding back all the others. if you install from the list of held packages until you run out of ones that don't complain, you'll eventually find the one that's the problem by deduction19:44
gnarface.. and when you find that one, show us the error it gives you19:44
Fnerdokay i will for now it runs smooth20:02
Fnerdhmm wohooo 97 packges remain :-)20:38
Fnerdwhoohoo i'm done with the upgrade22:35
Fnerdall fine22:35
fsmithred:)22:35
fsmithredDid you ever figure out which package was the culprit?22:36
Fnerdhmm nope22:46
Fnerdpackge after packge22:47
Fnerdproblem solved22:47
gnarfaceweird22:47
gnarfacei wonder if vmware could have something to do with it? seems like something i'd seen on sid before once, but on bare metal...22:48
Fnerdokay22:48
Fnerdwhen i go to sleep i will reboot the thing22:49
Fnerdbut the fun gos on and on i have a debain 10 vm here22:49
Fnerdthat would be fun :-)22:49
CueXXIIIFnerd: well, skipping a release is not supported by debian, so you want to upgrade it to 11 first23:07
FnerdCueXXIII: yep i know that23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!