libera/#devuan/ Friday, 2024-09-13

brocashelmi use a customized /etc/os-release01:20
brocashelmis it safe to pin base-files so that it doesn't overwrite the file?01:20
masonbrocashelm: You could also use dpkg-divert. That might be safer unless you have reason to hold the other stuff in base-files back.01:23
rwp+1 for dpkg-divert as the better way01:26
brocashelmit's mainly that i don't want prettyname to change from refracta to devuan01:49
brocashelmi have never messed with dpkg-divert01:49
brocashelmi just currently swap out the names and versions whenever i get an update01:50
fsmithredDo dpkg-divert. It's not too difficult and I would prefer that you tell me how to do it rather than figure it out myself and it can be part of the next refracta build so that you never have to edit that file again.01:51
fsmithredHere's an example. It can be done without creating a package and leaving out the --package option.01:58
fsmithredhttps://git.devuan.org/devuan/cryptsetup-modified-functions/src/branch/master/debian/preinst01:59
fsmithredThis one is undo: https://git.devuan.org/devuan/cryptsetup-modified-functions/src/branch/master/debian/postrm02:01
fsmithredand also leaving out everything except the dpkg-divert command02:02
rwpIs Refracta going to declare that it is not Devuan?03:07
fsmithredno, it'll still show itself as devuan. I'd have to look at /etc/os-release to figure out which fields to mess with.03:09
fsmithredI like the idea that some third-party software actually recognizes devuan.03:10
rwpMy own system provisioning scripts uses it to handle differences between Devuan, Debian, Ubuntu, Trisquel, Mint.03:14
fsmithredI used to change the name in /etc/lsb-release, and I see that mine says refracta 11 chimaera, but I'm running daedalus.03:15
fsmithredare there any fields that won't mess up your scripts or third-party softwre?03:16
rwpI don't know what is the right answer there.  I just write my script to dance around every possible system difference.  Devuan is currently nice and short.  Debian is quite messy.  I am using ID to get the system name (devuan, debian, ubuntu, etc) and VERSION_CODENAME to get chimaera, daedalus, etc.03:38
systemdleteany suggestions on a Linux-compatible USB webcam that more or less works-out-of-the-box?03:39
systemdletemy vx-800 seems to be dying or something--audio input is sketchy03:39
systemdletelately; it used to work fine03:39
rwpYes.  I will recommend the Logitech C920s Pro USB camera.  It works out of the box with in kernel drivers no problem.03:40
systemdleteaudio input also, right?03:41
rwpAnd I have seen a lot of that particular camera being used by various free software groups here at conferences and such.  Yes it has audio input too.03:41
systemdletethe web pages ddg hit all highly recommend that camera03:41
systemdleteok, thanks, rwp!03:41
rwpPre-pandemic it was US$50.  Pandemic hit everyone needs a camera it went to US$110.  I think it has come down in price since then now.03:42
systemdletewell, as long as it is not a fake ripoff (there is a lot of stuff on Amazon, eg., that is not the real mccoy) and works well, as you and the reviews say, then the money is not that big a deal atm03:44
rwpAmazon definitely has a counterfeit problem in general.  I don't know about this particular product.  But in general it's a problem.  Bought a USB charger.  It was good.  I ordered the SAME THING 6-weeks later.  A counterfeit arrived that couldn't fast charge.  Close examination showed that it was a counterfeit.03:48
rwpI bought mine pre-pandemic from a brick-and-mortar store in person.03:48
systemdleteoh, how I long for Fry's Electronics... my favorite computer store, now defunct.03:49
systemdleteThey had all kinds of cool shit, including tons and tons of stuff I would never even need.  But just to see all these electronics parts was koooool03:50
systemdleteNewegg can't seem to get its act together lately, so I wonder how much longer THEY will be around.  One seller shipped product to me via Amazon... and here, I thought I was doing a favor for competition, and they f-d me03:51
systemdletethen there was tigerdirect, which was very good, but they too are gone.03:51
systemdleteAmazon has successfully killed its competition.03:52
systemdleteI guess I can try Walmart and Target, but I am no fan of either of those than Amazon, tbh03:52
gnarfacei concur on the matter of the "Logitech, Inc. HD Pro Webcam C920" however, one note: if you use uvcdynctrl instead of v4l2-ctl, you'll get access to a few extra features03:53
systemdletebut anyway, got a class to attend, online.  Wish I had ordered this months ago03:53
systemdleteah, thanks for that tip03:53
systemdleteI'll try to install that when the cam arrives.  Yeah, it's north of $100, and one promises a 4 port USB3 hub03:54
systemdleteNot sure I need it, or why they are bundling that way, but maybe I should get the two together.03:54
systemdletethanks rrq03:54
systemdletethanks gnarface03:55
gnarfacehmm, mine does not have a usb hub built-in03:55
gnarfacethey must have more than one revision03:55
systemdletenot a built-in, advertised as a separate piece03:55
onefangThat was rwp, not rrq.03:55
systemdletethat's why I'm surprised at the cobo03:55
systemdleteoops03:55
rwpMine does not have a USB hub either.  Just the camera and audio.03:55
systemdletehi rrq03:55
systemdletethanks rwp03:55
* systemdlete will see about ordering new fingers more compatible with a keyboard!03:56
systemdletebbl03:56
gnarfacei also have a "Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd HP Deluxe Webcam KQ246AA" that works fine, might be cheaper (in my head the box for this also said logitech, but i'm not sure now)03:56
gnarfaceoh, no, my bad, the thing clearly has a HP logo on it, i must have just munged the two memories in my head03:57
gnarfacebut yea it also has a mic03:57
rwpWhenever I visited California I always stopped in at Fry's.  It was such an interesting place.  It was the gas station convenience store.  You could buy a gallon of milk to go with your ram chips.03:57
gnarfacesomewhat lower res than the C920 but still suitable for conferencing03:58
rwpI also have an ancient Creative Labs camera but literally that's another example where 6 months later I tried to buy the same model again and this time it was the vendor that changed the manufacturing line and the same part number camera was then completely different internally, compressing the data stream making it opaque to the free software driver, and it still doesn't work.  I pull it out and try it every so often.  But it's ancient03:59
rwpnow.  I gave the original one away in 2020.03:59
gnarfacethat happened to me with an older Creative Labs camera04:00
brocashelmfsmithred: https://dpaste.org/48DWr04:00
brocashelmthat's how i set my os-release file each time04:00
rwpI think ID should definitely always be lower case.04:05
rwpSame with ID_LIKE too.04:05
rwpNAME and PRETTY_NAME can be stylized.04:05
onefangI would expect something called PRETTY_NAME could be made pretty.04:06
onefangI was just reading about the new emojis.  lol04:07
rwpI will also ask to please no multi-byte characters in those anywhere either, though NAME and PRETTY_NAME would be acceptable there.04:08
onefangSo all we need do is convince Unicode to include the Devuan swoosh.04:14
brocashelmi'm keeping them as is04:33
brocashelmthat was to show how i have mine set up, which works for my use cases04:33
FatPhilrwp - those cameras are from ~1995? I remember the ones from that era as I was working in video conferencing, and we had to know what the competitors were doing.09:37
rwpFatPhil, No not a 1990s camera.  The Logitech C920S Pro HD is a modern era 1080p Full HD camera so not 4K but good.  Not sure when it started to be seen but I see reviews from 2021.  And yet Tom's Hardware reviewed it just this year so it is still considered relevant.18:42
FatPhilyou and I have different perspectives on "ancient", clearly!20:17
rwpFatPhil, Oh!  Were you talking about the Creative Labs one?  Yes that was from the 1990s.  I was talking about the recent Logitech camera.20:51
rwpThe Creative Labs one was yet another example where you can't buy the same thing twice in a row and have it be the same.  Same part number but the second one had a completely different (non-free driver) chipset.  Totally bad.  Same vendor and same part number!20:51
gnarfacedoes the Creative Labs camera in question happen to use the ov511 driver? just wondering if it's actually same one i have here (one of 3 incompatible revisions in the wild, iirc)21:18
gnarfacehmm, or i guess i think it used to be called ov511 anyway...not seeing it in current kernel builds21:21
gnarfacei haven't bothered taking that one out in a while, the picture quality they were able to attain never managed to approach the windows software, and it uses more power than the newer cameras, enough more that it's problematic trying to drive it from small ARM SoC boards21:22
FatPhilcreative labs were pretty terrible for that, with everything they made, they were changing chipset suppliers all the time. I remember buying an IDE creative labs DVD drive, and it didn't talk IDE to my motherboard properly. There was a windows driver, but it never worked in linux.21:27
rwpgnarface, I gave that camera away in 2020 so I don't know and don't have an easy way to find out.  And the replacement which was different I still have only because it is worthless.  I should scrap it out.21:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!